How to use doll-making as a transformative technique to reflect on body, socialisation and stigma

Doll-making was integrated into Inclusive and Affirming Ministries’ (IAM) processes as a creative way for participants to consider their own creation (combining spirituality and the body), how they were conditioned into gendered roles, and how the lessons have affected their behaviour, relationships, and way of thinking today. Throughout the process, participants are asked to have a talking partner in addition to a companion and listening partner.

Dolls socialise children into gender roles, reinforce social identities and may be used in conflict resolution. The use of dolls in the IAM workshops have been instrumental in participants questioning their own learnings on gender, trauma located in upkeeping of gender roles and how they have passed on these teachings knowingly and unconsciously.

Hastings (2003) notes that dolls have the transformational ability and, across cultures they have been used to symbolise individuals and goddesses. Through art therapy, dolls can help people go from a state of grief and fragmentation to certain forms of solace and healing since they symbolize something bigger than themselves. With the dolls’ personas, which can be entwined with the owner’s experience, people can tell their stories without (re) experiencing the pain. By enabling the person to reflect rather than be impacted by stories about trauma, pain, loss, violence, or exclusion, dolls can be utilized to shift power in narratives. The doll mirrors these internalised emotions and characteristics, participants may go from internalised to externalised conversations during the doll-making process even while they lack the language to express their experiences (of trauma, suffering, loss, violence, or rejection).

Advocates faced challenged dealing with their own strong cultural, religious, and socialised ideas. As dolls are traditionally associated with femininity, male participants may first be uninterested. As they become fully involved in the process, they discover that the exercise is enjoyable, and some even express a desire to use it with their kids. Participants’ relational connection is strengthened as they converse, drawing on childhood stories whilst working on their doll.

If a participant has trauma/grief that has been unresolved this exercise challenges them to reflect and process it. The doll becomes a reflection of their own body and when they are asked to add stuffing, they reflect on what they had been ‘stuffed’ with and what they choose to stuff the doll with. This turns into a place where they can work through their internal turmoil and find healing.

 

  • Having a partner to talk to during the process, assures that the participants is not alone in the process. They are given space to share as little or as much as they wish to, and this allows them to feel safe.
  • The exercise is given to all participants regardless of gender. This become significant in that all participants express and accept that no one has an advantage over the other. That they are in the process together. It is always interesting to note how they help each other, often choosing to put their doll on hold to complete in the evening.
  • Participants are asked to name their doll and share a little about the doll. Often participants will reflect on what the doll is wearing, its physical attributes and what does this represent of its maker. This once again becomes an externalization exercise, whereby the maker holds power instead of being disempowered by their grief/trauma.

  • The narratives about gender, the body and faith. How the church, family and society reprimands deviation from what is accepted. It was interesting to note how those that held strong beliefs on heteronormativity, laughed as they spoke about instances that they explored femininity (as men), games they played as young boys exploring their bodies and the impacts of being taught to be silent about such stories.
  • How the body remembers and carries scars from harsh reprisals of deviation from heterosexuality. One participant shared how at first, they didn’t want to participate as in school needlework was assigned to the girls and woodwork to the boys. As a transman, he would endure lessons assigned to females with no space to ask to be removed from the class. This led to him disliking anything that had to do with sewing, often relying on his mother or dressmakers for even the slightest things.
  • Lessons about how a woman’s body is praised when it can procreate and chastised when it can’t. One participant talked on how women are expected to have children after marriage and how being unable to conceive can lead to rejection and being viewed as a failure, a stigma that the husband is typically exempt from.
  • One participant shared how their doll wore both male and female clothing to show how in heir home, everyone was expected to contribute to the household regardless of gender. This has influenced how they have navigated life, their advocacy and their relationships. The doll was non-binary and with no name.

It’s important for the facilitator to ensure that there is someone available to provide counselling or pastoral care should any of the participants need support after the session. The facilitator must also ensure that no-one is exempt from the process. They may assist with some of tasks such putting thread through the needles or providing resources, but the participants have to follow the process through. From the drawing of a template, to cutting out, to stitching and to stuffing.

The facilitator may sit in some of the conversations only if the participants allow it. The facilitator must encourage participants to use the full venue space, so participants don’t feel like other participants are eavesdropping on their personal narratives.

You can read more about the ‘doll exercise’ at this link: https://iam.org.za/aiovg_videos/the-doll-exercise/

Author Nokuthula ‘Thuli’ Mjwara. Strategic Advocacy Coordinator, Inclusive and Affirming Ministries

Thuli works at Inclusive and Affirming Ministries (IAM) as the strategic Advocacy Coordinator. IAM aims to combat religiously motivated homophobia, transphobia, and biphobia. IAM is a well-known NGO with 30 years of experience in interventions, having helped to improve faith spaces (mostly Christian denominational settings).

In addition to being a certified facilitator and assessor, Thuli is an activist for social justice. Through creative methods based on art therapy, storytelling, and introspection, Thuli opens hearts and changes minds. She collaborates with civil society partners in the LGBTQIA movement and the women’s sector to combat the stigma and persecution of LGBTQI people in religious settings and communities.

11:31

Resource Film: ‘My Gendered Being’ / The Doll Exercise - Inclusive & Affirming Ministries

Get in touch

We created AmplifyChange Learn to support you. If you have a question, feedback on how we can improve or would like to apply to write a guide, please reach out.

    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.